by Peter Christian and Bryan Vickroy
Today the Western Conference Finals begin with the Chicago Blackhawks lining up against the San Jose Sharks. There is no shortage of story lines for this series (such as former Badger linemates playing against each other or the mayors of each city making lame wagers on the series winner) but sometimes you need to just compare the teams on the ice. Thankfully, for you, Peter Christian and Bryan Vickroy have the goods for you with a head to head breakdown of the series. Peter will be representing the Blackhawks and Bryan the Sharks.
Offense
(PC) The Blackhawks have a fierce top line that jump starts the whole offense. Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane are among the most exciting young uber-talents in the league. They play side by side, are currently responsible for 13 of the team’s 40 postseason goals. Behind them on the 2nd line are Patrick Sharp and Marian Hossa, both scoring-minded forwards themselves. However, the ability to find the score sheet from the rest of the team drops off pretty quickly. That’s not saying the Blackhawks are inept outside their top 4 scorers, but that they don’t usually get consecutive scoring performances from the rest of their forwards.
In order to succeed over the Sharks, Dustin Byfuglien, Kris Versteeg and Dave Bolland are going to have to outplay their Sharks counterparts.
(BV) Sharks have weapons up and down the lineup who can score at will. They’re basically a team with the depth of two top lines. The scoring well tends to run dry in the playoffs, so they must continue to keep the pressure on and not lose their scoring touch. San Jose has been the best team in hockey the last two years because they put goals home. Joe Pavelski has become the breakout star of 2010. After his Olympic heroics, he’s displayed a penchant for clutch postseason goals.
Advantage: San Jose
Defense
(PC) The Blackhawks have a lot of name recognition on their blue line and yet they rely HEAVILY on the play of Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook. Keith logs more than 27 minutes of ice time each game and Seabrook gets more than 22. Injuries and inconsistent play has hampered the defensive unit this season and at times made the Blackhawks vulnerable to odd man rushes and prolonged play inside their own zone. It’s obvious Brian Campbell is still recovering from the broken collarbone that kept him out for about 5 weeks as he’s still not at the top of his game. If Keith or Seabrook ever start showing signs of fatigue, the Hawks are in trouble.
(BV) You may not know who any of the Sharks’ defensemen are, but trust me, the rest of the NHL does. This corps is deep, experienced, and not afraid to try and put a goal home by themselves. Strong positional play allows the forwards to fly up ice, and good goal-tending allows them to take more chances than usual. Not overly physical, but they won’t shy away from contact either. Occasionally, they will lose focus of players or game situation which lead to scoring opportunities.
Advantage: San Jose
Goaltending
(PC) Antti Niemi hasn’t been exactly rock solid throughout the playoffs, but he hasn’t really cost the Blackhawks either. He’s been up to the task when challenged and more than a handful of the 30 goals he’s allowed in the 12 post season games have been due to his defense not doing their jobs. He’s also proved that, as a rookie, he can handle the pressure and the stress that the playoffs put on goalies. He’s got the physical abilities to be elite and it appears he has the mental wherewithal to stand up to the adversity of the game.
(BV) Evgeni Nabokov may be one of the elite goaltenders in the league. He has the stats to back it up, and a long resume of quality wins. However, he is one of the biggest head cases in net. He’s melted down in so many big spots, including the Olympics this year for Russia. Very little depth or experience behind Nabokov, so it’s Evgeni’s brain the Sharks will live and die with. Expect Chicago to run him early and often, trying to rattle him and psych him out.
Advantage: Chicago
Coaching
(PC) I would argue that coaching with a mustache as sweet as Joel Quenneville’s is the only advantage a team needs, but Q-Stache is reliable on the bench as well. He’s got 10 years previous playoff experience and has been to the Western Conference Finals twice before. I’ve got faith in Quenneville and so does the Chicago locker room.
(BV) Coach Todd McLellan seems to have learned from his playoff baptism last year, and his tinkering with this team have led to optimum gains, so far. Much of this team has never experience the pressure ratcheted up this high, including McLellan. If he can keep a steady hand and not let this team fold under pressure again, he has a chance of winning the mind games with the Q-‘stache.
(BV) The best team when not 5 on 5 during the regular season has cooled a touch in the postseason, but the Sharks are still dangerous. Somewhat passive PK leads to rebounds, but otherwise they’ve been solid. Their power play is a danger to score everytime they control the puck. Have a penchant for over beautifying a play and missing opportunities.